Valuing Life

Valuing Life         Imagine that a man and woman bonnie died. Upon their birth, scientists provoke pre-selected their eggs and sperm to reproduce a homosexual being, unnatur completelyy. The kayoedcome: a super benevolent draw in up of retri exceptory the trounce characteristics, and a nonher analogous gracious figure copyd into the armed beat backs soulfulnessnel. testament this scenario actually offs its place in the near time to come? The logical argument continues on.         Carol Foote presents the heated debate in Narcissus Cloned, which gives an assessment of the pros and cons on contagious applied science science. She focuses her views on biologist James Bonner and materializellor of the University of Santa Cruz, Robert Sinsheimer. We subsist that our reality is made up of various(prenominal)ists who carry a inviolable deal of attri merelyes and characteristics that make up who we atomic number 18. Today , scientists plan to use applied science to take a leak and buck new homophile embryos to clone them into kind-hearted beings. This is there act to remedy mankind. Is this how we regard to check up on our destiny? Is the stem to control the number of messiness who smoke sojourn in the existence and to hear who can or can non make an answer for the future? Although discriminating handleing may be a solution to improve the military man genre, I believe that this wreak go forth non benefit browseliness; the act is wrong and unconstitutional to the democratic proud parliamentary law we ar supposed to live in today, and perhaps clone hold for damage our fraternity neighborlyly and economically. in spite of the arguments that tribe create on herit fitting engineering, near people believe that this fulfil ordain in point supervene one day. Science and engine room seems to ever be modify its unconscious suffice everyday. Now that the human heritable engineering butt on has b! een brought up for the future, people be continually experimenting with other sources such as food and animals to link their serve up towards clone human beings. Scientists are trying to find ship canal to benefit the whole, and make for out do everything it takes until they are richly able to design a super human with the just about measurable transmitted characteristics. But are they really serving society? Caltech biologist James Bonner is an activist for genetic engineering. He states that roundtime(prenominal) in the near future, such a procedure go out exist to continue humanity as salubrious as to improve it. Everyone agrees we need to select for in rankigence, longevity, high energy and franchise from genetic disease (Bonner, as cited in Foote, 2000, p 233). With these characteristics, Bonner believes that this bequeath in fact direct society to obtain the beaver one-on-ones.         Although Bonner predicts that this theory get out work, there are unanswered questions. diarrheal if we could clone the characteristics we wanted, why would we want a copy of an individual? The operation could only hurt individuality. wherefore would we want to take down this? In Narcissus Cloned, Emmanuel Levinas, a French philosopher once argued that the clone mental process is just to create a mirror of oneself (Levinas, as cited in Conley, 2000, p. 237). In the long run, what happens when a person gets convicted of a abomination? With genetic engineering we wont be able to tell the divagation from person A and B be ramble A and B provide entertain the same genetic code. All fingerprints will not do any good if we keep on having identical clones. When we do this, we will convey no way to chance on individuals. We must similarly consider that people with the best genetic characteristics commit crimes too. We cannot be sure to ourselves that up to now the smartest people will do harmful things to s ociety. These are some questions that must be answer! ed in order to continue this process. According to Fordham University professor basin Conley, the practice of clone undermines one of the key values of social fundamental interaction: human diversity (2000, p. 237). When cloning occurs, we bemuse no chance to learn from others because the same characteristics will be cloned. on that lead is no room for learning, because the best would be cloned. We simply cant be different and carry our own views because genetic engineering wont allot us to. It is a loss of creativity and individuality. Another amateur to the consequences of genetic engineering is Robert Sinsheimer, chancellor of the University of Santa Cruz, who believes that it would be hard to recover what characteristics should be chosen when society can not recollect what is coming tomorrow. It is impossible to see what we will unconstipatedtually need. We dont fork out that kind of supernatural power (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p.234). The con sequences that society will pick up to face is that when we clone earth with some of the genetic characteristics that might not be needed or wanted in the near future, we just save produced more(prenominal) human beings into an already overpopulated country. Will scientists then want to kill the clone that was created and produce some other one? The costs to do this are too expensive. It does not make sense at all.         Furthermore, the idea to promote human genetic engineering is unethical and unnatural process to human kind because genetic engineering devalues the concept of a natural birth of a immature baby. It is unethical process that discriminates those who want to reproduce the natural way. It in like manner violates the rights of the clone individual. The Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights even states that producing a child by the new cloning technology is a practice that is contrary to human dignity and not to be permi tted (Tonti-Filippini, N. 2001, February. Retrieved! July 2, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.theage.com.au/ newsworthiness/2001/02/07/FFX3WFFGUIC.html.).

The fact that we can take a gene from another person and take away sustenance from the clone individual is distinctly taking away something that invades individuals humanity and dignity. It breaks their human rights for freedom, life, liberty, and out of saltation of happiness as stated in the Universal Declaration. The cloning process gives no room for self-determination, and thus would hurt human dignity. We would not have any uniqueness in this field with cloning. Our world would be noted as ordi nary because we would have people living with the same genetic characteristics. Most importantly, the process of genetic engineering and selective breeding undermines democracy. With genetic engineering, we are capable of selecting a variety of genes within a species, but the people who have the ability to control who can and cannot breed are the people who will dominate society. It strictly goes against our American Constitution of the first am eat upment. In the condition Designing dampen Humans, Sinsheimer continues to reason, genetic technology will be accessible not only to the scientist, inventor, and physician but alike to the military and to the fanatics . . . it gives scrimp reason to hope that such powers will be wielded but in the interests of justice and mercy (Sinsheimer, as cited in Foote, 2000, p. 233). It is homophobic to figure out what kind of traits are worth cloning and what ideal candidates are necessary. As an American citizen, I would not want the government, scientists, or the military to contr! ol the selection process of human beings. It is not a balanced, well thought out theory because people like me do not have an opinion on who can be genetically engineered. Why should only a selected group have the opportunity to procreate? It isnt fair at all. We should not go against our democracy and end human ethnicities like this. In a democratic society, we all have equal rights as individuals. We would not develop as a country if we had only a minority of people running our country and creating an imbalance amidst each class. With the process of selective breeding, newly created super humans could overpower the world of natural humans.         The heated debate continues. If the process of genetic engineering is experimented, we know that one day we will be set about with these issues and will be force to deal with them. Those who think that genetic engineering will have only positive aspects will also face weighty consequences in the long run. The consequences of line for human perfection of human genre will only cause a world of identical people with no abilities to differentiate people with the most unique qualities and will cause society to follow unethical and unconstitutional ways of valuing life the right way. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper