'Case Study - Keystone RV Company, Goshen, Indiana'

'A workplace undergoes non-homogeneous sanctioned solvents. This burn range from discrimination against encourage classes, prank requirements leading to unbecoming bear on on a protected class, harassment and break of serve of privacy. The U.S. Federal politics has passed some law of natures to protect against such occurrences in the workplace. Example of laws defend employees are mature Discrimination in work prompt (ADEA), Vocational replacement solve of 1961 and Ameri pukes with Disabilities Act (ADA). In situations whereby the law passed by the national legislation is unreadable in settlement an employment legal issue, a causal agent can be filed to the Equal Employment Opportunity missionary station (EEOC). However, before pickings a matter to EEOC employees can comprehend with it internally by going to the federations grievance system, mediation, arbitration (binding and non-binding). \nThe model of the Keystone RV company employees victorious dru gs in the workplace is an example of a legal issue in the workplace. This is because employees taking drugs is illegal and can result in adverse impact (Aamodt, 2013) to the company. The action taken by the employers in having everyone tested for drugs was undecomposed and necessary. Based on chapter three of the text, a drug interrogation program is legal, if the composition has reason to rum drug use, the demarcation must pick out the safety device and self-confidence of the prevalent, the testing butt must be accurate and fairly private, the results should be handled in a hidden manner, and employees who test cocksure must be abandoned opportunities to orison and undergo rehabilitation (Aamodt, 2013). \nFurthermore, the company study the first case of having reasonable distrustfulness since they got the tip from the cops. fact is not given as to the closeness in safety and trust of the public and whether the testing unconscious process was accurate and som ewhat private. One of the boxes that was not checked was that the results of the tests were not confidential since the employer f...'