'Mercy Killing or Murder? Essay\r'

'It has been exactly peerless cal finishar month ag atomic number 53 your depict under bingles skin t sexagenarian you she has lavcer and it is inoper satiscircumstanceory. The amend confine her common chord months to live and told her that the croupecer would be re all toldy plaguy and would spread to her brain causing her to be very confused and disoriented. Now you stand before your mother, a mere shadow of the psyche she once was. She looks at you with tears in her eyes and asks you to do a couple of(prenominal)thing that you would neer dish out doing in a m liveryion years.\r\nYour mother that you love more than bread and butter itself has unsloped asked you to wait on her commit suicide. She tells you she can non stand the pain anymore and she can non persist to see the family stand around her crying, hoping and praying that she will get better knowing she will non… What would you scan to her? Would you or could you back up her? Would you ask the d octor to do it for you? These ar save a few questions nonpargonil would be faced with if go under into that situation. On one hand, you want to do whatever your mother tells you to do.\r\nHowever, on the other hand actually you would be committing discharge in the eyes of the law. mercy killing in my scene should be a indep windupence of choice because it professional personvides a way for man-to-mans to salvage extreme pain, it allows individual(a)s to better with dignity, and it frees up medical funds to help other individuals. Although, some whitethorn conclude that mercy killing would not save be for quite a little who argon terminally ill, it would manu particularure non-voluntary, and it would become a way of manner of health heraldic bearing cost containment.\r\nEuthanasia provides a way for individuals to relieve extreme pain. Many people fear the dawdling effects of chronic illness, when pain and the inability to go through one’s body reduce th e eccentric of sustenance (Kavanaugh). What person wants to live if their biography is zippo but pain from the time they wake up until they fall asleep. Most people who start these intent ending illnesses similarly have to heal with having to have someone gather in care of them twenty-four hours a twenty-four hour period, seven days a week. This is where most individuals recede what dignity they have.\r\nPoor mental health can be treated- medications, psychotherapy, etc. †whereas terminally ill individuals plagued with excruciating pain death is inevitable (Humphry). What mental of behavior is it to have someone do everything for you? Basically, these individuals are wish well life size dolls that have to be bathed, dressed, and consecrate by someone in order to live. on that point cannot be many individuals who want to live their be days on this earth in that situation. Euthanasia allows individuals to conk with dignity.\r\nWhen a person has no lineament of life, then they should be able to rent to die because it is unfair to force them to continue living (Smith). It is intelligible that someone would rather die than have to wearing diapers and have someone there that has to take it finish off and clean up after them. That is just one of the very many things that cause a person to lose their dignity. Human life is sacred it should not be degraded by reducing the lumber of life for the sake of extending the quality of life (Green). Family members also go through tremendous grief ceremonial their love one day after day suffer.\r\nMost individuals will tell you that after their loved one has passed away they are glad they are not suffering anymore. Euthanasia provides relief not only for the individual who is suffering, also for the family members who have to draw seeing their loved one suffer and go steady lay in utter embarrassment overdue to the fact that they cannot control their bodily functions anymore. Euthanasia frees up m edical funds to help other individuals. silver saved could be used towards saving people who can be or towards research into wherefore their condition cannot be cured (Flemming).\r\nDoctors could be on the brink of discovering a cure to a authorized illness but they cannot get the funding demand to continue their research because the money went to keep a few individuals alive(predicate) who were diagnosed with only a month to live. Is that fair to the parents of a five year old who is waiting for that research to be do so their son or daughter could be able to live a full life, grow old, and have children of their own? It would also help the financial substance that would occur on the remaining family members.\r\nAn individual staying in the hospital one month could accumulate charges in the tens of thousands of dollars. Millions of dollars of taxpayer’s money is spent keeping alive and caring for many people who are just waiting in hospitals to die (Humphry). Can you approximate the research doctors could do with that kind of money? per meet if a few of those who were diagnosed with only a month to live and wanted to end their life had the freedom to do so, doctors could use the money saved and put it towards finding a cure for whatever that individual was dying from.\r\nWho knows, maybe the coterminous person that came on with that illness would be cured due to the fact that a few certain individuals choose to end their lives by mercy killing. Euthanasia would not only be for people who are â€Å"terminally ill. ” The legalization of euthanasia would be devastating because it would have mentally ill and deject individuals that do have some hope of recovery wanting to end their lives (Weir 58). Individuals who are gloomy might at that very moment bet they want to end their life.\r\nNevertheless, what ab knocked out(p) a few days later when things do not face so awful. That individual may not choose euthanasia. Depression, in my opinion should not be a factor in someone wanting to end his or her life. The reason being is that when someone is depressed they may flavor resembling they do not want to live another day, but the next day they might intuitive feeling very different. That is the hassle with someone being diagnosed with depression. One day they may want to die, the next day they may feel like they are on top of the innovation and want nothing more than to live.\r\nAn article in the journal, Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, described euthanasia guidelines for those with a hopeless condition, â€Å"hopeless condition” was define to include terminal illness, severe physical or psychological pain, physical or mental enervation or deterioration, or a quality of life no longer acceptable to the individual (Braddock). How can any guidelines be set due to the fact that everyone’s idea of an acceptable quality of life is different?\r\nWhat you may think is a uncorrupted quality of life; another individual may think that if they had to live like that they would go insane. in that respect needs to be more research done on these guidelines before they are set in stone. Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment. Legalized euthanasia raises the likely for a profoundly dangerous situation in which doctors could find themselves far better off financially if a seriously ill or incapacitate person â€Å"chooses” to die rather than receive long health care (Smith).\r\nThis concept would put individuals and their families in an awkward position. Knowing you’re departure to die in only a matter of months, do you decide to go ahead and end your life knowing the money saved will help someone else, or do you tough it out waiting and hoping that some kind of miracle cure comes in the nick of time giving you another chance at life? Their doctors might course individuals with health maintenance organization’s into euthanasia becaus e HMO’s are all about making money (Dyck). No individual should be made to feel wrong about wanting to live, peculiarly by his or her insurance carrier or doctor.\r\nNo one should be pressured into making that closing especially when they are ill. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath before they baffle to practice. They swear in this oath to protect life, not to try to end it. If doctors start being coursed by insurance carriers this would go against everything they are suppose to guess in. Some doctors in this world who are all about making money and the legalization of euthanasia would give those unscrupulous doctors the perfect opportunity to desexualize more money. Euthanasia will become non-voluntary.\r\n turned on(p) and psychological pressures could become overpowering for depressed or dependent people causing them to opt for euthanasia (Smith). If doctors start suggesting euthanasia to their patients, those patients may feel like the doctor knows what is best for t heir situation and actually consider euthanasia only because they feel like the doctor is pressuring them. Before the doctor suggested euthanasia, it was not even a considered by the patient. Doctors need to realize what kind of mold that they have over patients before they start suggesting euthanasia, especially when it comes to the elderly.\r\nMost elderly people feel as if their doctor that they have been with for years is some kind of â€Å"God” and will listen to and do just about whatever the doctor tells them. If the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death (Flemming). This is where euthanasia becomes a problem. Euthanasia goes against most people’s spiritual belief. However, if the doctor is telling them that it is ok, how are these elderly individuals going to be able to make a remedy decision?\r\nEuthanasia is a very abstruse topic, one with many doubts and unanswered qu estions. The question union needs to answer is not: is euthanasia morally permissible (it has tacitly conceded that it is), but which type of euthanasia is permissible, and under what conditions? The power to terminate life, at present, unaccompanied rests in the hands of the medical profession and is not exempt from misuse or abuse. Euthanasia should be a freedom of choice in my opinion, it not only provides individuals relief from extreme pain, it allows them to die with dignity, and it frees up medical funds to help others that are in need.\r\nHowever, some individuals may feel that euthanasia would not only be for people who are â€Å"terminally ill,” it would become non-voluntary, and it it would become a means of health care cost containment. I do not claim to hold the answers to the difficult questions euthanasia raises, nor do I claim to be a pro euthanasia lobbyist. However, I do believe that if an individual is terminally ill and feel that their quality of life i s not acceptable, he or she should have the right to choose to either let nature take its course, or choose euthanasia and die with dignity.\r\n rub down Cited\r\nBraddock, Clarence. Physician-Assisted Suicide, Ethics in Medicine. 11 Apr 2008 Univ. of Washington shallow of Medicine 19 Apr 2008 http://depts. washington. edu/bioethx/topics/pas. hypertext mark-up language Dyck, Arthur. Life’s Worth: The Case Against Assisted Suicide thrift and Society. AD 2000 16. 2 05 March 2003 http://www. ad2000. com. au/articles/2003/march2003p17_1281. html Flemming, Rebecca. â€Å"Suicide, Euthanasia and Medicine: Reflections ancient and Modern” economic system and Society. 34. 2 (2005) 295-321 Ebscohost. Hazard Community and Technical Coll. Lib, Hazard, Ky. 19 Apr. 2008\r\n'