Critique of Jean Watson’s Theory Essay

The Theory of Human Caring was written by Jean Watson. This model consists of ten carative factors to assist think ofs with affectionateness for their patients. Dr. Watson calls this a trans personalized kind. Watson defines transpersonal financial aid as the capacity of one human being to receive another(prenominal) human beings expression of feelings and to experience those feelings for oneself (Walker, 1996, p. 992). It is much much than a scripted therapeutic response, it is a moral duty that rises from inwardly the nurse, and Watson identifies nursing as both an art and a acquaintance.The first premiss of this theory is that the to a greater extent individual the feelings are, that the nurse transmits, the more strongly does the sympathize with process affect the recipient (Walker, 1996). The two persons in a caring transaction are both in the process of being and becoming.The atomic issue forth 42 of coming together in an actual caring occasion presents the fortune for each person to learn from the other, how to be human. Watson implies more than a perfect mergence of experiences she suggests a spiritual union of souls (Watson, 2008 Walker, 1996, p. 92). This writing will evaluate Watsons theory and critique victimization Chinn and Kramers model of evaluation using description, clarity, simplicity, generalizability, accessibility, and importance (Meleis, 2012, p. 184). Clarity Watson precisely defines the concepts and sub concepts central to this theory. Watson explains abstract phenomena by using ordinary wording in extraordinary ways, and uses nontechnical, sophisticated, fluid, and evolutionary actors line to artfully describe concepts.Watsons propensity toward metaphorical expression adds indispensableness to her moral message for nursing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). At times, lengthy phrases and sentences mustiness be read more than once to convey sum. The increasing inclusion of metaphors, personal reflections, artwork, and poetr y make her complex concepts more tangible and more aesthetically sympathetic (Walker, 1996). According to Watson, A model of caring science that goes beyond an intellectualization of the topic invites us into a timeless unless timely space to revisit this perennial phenomenon of the human condition (Watson, 2008, p. 8).Critics of Watsons work have concentrated on the use of undefined or changing/shifting definitions and terms and her focus on the psychosocial rather than the pathophysiological aspects of nursing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010, p. 101). Watson tends to explain abstract phenomena by using ordinary language in extraordinary ways. Watsons propensity toward metaphorical expression adds emergency to her moral message for nursing (Walker, 1996). Simplicity Watson draws on a number of disciplines to formulate her theory.To understand the theory as it is presented, the reader does best by being familiar with the broad subject matter. The theory is more more or less being tha n ab give away doing, and it must be internalized thoroughly by the nurse if it is to be actualized in practice. Health as harmonious unity of mind-body-soul recapitulates tenseness on human idealism inspires nurses to readopt or realign themselves with a freight to care (Walker, 1996). Basic concepts and premises appeal to nurses exhausting to carve out a caring practice in the context of contemporary wellness care. GeneralizabilityWatsons theory seeks to provide a moral and philosophical root word for nursing. The scope of the framework encompasses all aspects of the health illness phenomenon. In concomitant the theory addresses aspects of preventing illness and experiencing a peaceful death, thereby increasing its inductive reasoning (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). The carative factors that Watson described provide important guidelines for nurse patient fundamental interaction however, some critics have stated that their generality is limited by the wildness lay on psychosoc ial rather than physiological aspects of care (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).Transpersonal relationships jackpot put the patient at ease, trust increases, and this is an exceptional environment for improve to take place. Watson explains that concepts, defined as building blocks of theory, bring new meaning to the paradigm of nursing and were derived from clinically inducted, empirical experiences, combined with philosophical, intellectual and existential background thus her early work emerged from her own values, beliefs, and perceptions about personhood, life, health, and meliorate (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).Accessibility Another characteristic of the theory is that it does not translate explicit directions about what to do to achieve authentic caring better relationship. Nurses who want concrete guidelines may not feel secure when trying to rely on the theory alone. round suggest it would take excessively long to incorporate the caritas into practice, and others state that th e emphasis on Watsons personal growth gives her latest book an idiosyncratic quality that while appealing to some may not appeal to others (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).This theory does not lend itself easily to research conducted through traditional scientific methods (Walker, 1996). Some critics have stated that generality is limited by the emphasis placed on psychosocial rather than physiological aspects of caring (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). Watson continues to state how the transpersonal relationship is the foundation of her theory, she calls this a special kind of human care relationship, a union with another person-high regard for the whole person and their being in the world (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).