Does Science Tells Us the truth Essay

In the Ameri stinker heritage lexicon of the English Language, skill has been defined as the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical accounting of internal phenomenon (Gottlieb, 1997). But can these explanations be equated to justness? Through start history, cognition has developed myriad occurrences in the universe. However, until today, many still questions the validity of scientific knowledge in relation to its rightfulness and the veracity of its claimed impartialityfulness. gibe to Gottlied (1997), erudition is an intellectual activitydesigned to discover information.This information is and so organized and utilisationd to create a meaningful pattern that can explain natural phenomenon (Gotltieb, 1997). It is also said that the main purpose of accomplishment is to collect facts that discern the rig that exists between and amongst the various facts (Gottliedb, 1997). The ability of attainment to discern and collect f acts to give meaningful explanation of the causes and effects of natural phenomena turns a way of discovering the truth. Without science there would be no sketch to work on these explanations and the truth will be left undiscovered and mankind will be left in the dark question about(predicate) things.Does science tells us the truth? Or is it concern with the involvement of truth? According to Esting (1998), scientists must understand that it is moral cowardice to part the practice of science from the pursuit of truth. This only means that scientist should use science in order to discover the truth and inform the race of what lies behind every scientifically explainable phenomenon. In addition, Esting (1998) also mentioned that the specified fact that science is but a mere creation of men, does non change the purpose of science, which is the pursuit of truth.For example, according to the oblige, What Is, versus What Should Be (n. d. ), it is mentioned that science is much concerned in explaining the what is truth of things, thought it cannot provide the facts of the what should truth of things. Moreover, the article also stated that science knows the truth of nature, but only on the material side and incorporates technology to explain how to achieve and prove this fact. In order to explain this claim, take the case of pure science article of belief of the freezing point of water.Science tells us that water freezes when temperature drops to nada degrees Celsius. In this regard, technology then suggests and explains the various ways on how to drop the temperature to zero (What Is versus What Should be, n. d. ). Meanwhile, to answer the question, Cross (200) mentioned that the best way to determine whether or not science tell us the truth is to understand how scientists regard and how they arrive at their conclusions. According to him, the existence of science is for the discovery and correspondence of human nature apart from the fact of existence of men.In order to understand the laws of nature, we gather facts and formulate theories to explain every phenomenon. These theories try to explain why things happen, why things did not happen and why natural results argon unavoidable. The results of these queries by the scientists are then published and made known to the exoteric for whom the information of the conclusion is intended for. Once these conclusions are released, they became open to examination and other scientists try to prove wrong these findings by conducting their own experiments and data gathering or by modifying these conclusions based on their own findings (Cross, 2000).When scientific findings and conclusiosn remain unchallenged, they become the working guidelines for human actions, which then become facts of bread and butter and the truth. Because many people trust how science works, science has become their only way to tell the truth and at least explain the truth about things (Cross, 2000). As it is prov ided by Cross (2000), science has been enormously successful in giving us explanations of the world around us. However the explanation as to whether or not science does tells us the truth, lies on the determination of what the truth is or what the truth is all about.According to Bradley (2004), even Einstein, one of the greatest scientists of all time, who showed and discovered the truth about things, showed that everything is relative (Bradley, 2004) and that truth itself is relative (Bradley, 2004). The relativity of what the truth is also results to the relativity of the findings and conclusions of science in relation to the truth and how people perceive what the truth is. Finally, science is never an infallible aspect of human existence.There are times that science cannot also explain certain phenomenon, not at the present at least. But, this should not be seen as to mean that science does not tell the truth but rather, its own limitations and the vagueness of life itself, hide s the truth from even among the greatest scientists of our time. If men would live in doubt of the truth offered by science and scientific knowledge then all science becomes futile the search for objective knowledge becomes futile and no scientific knowledge gathered to date can be true(Gottlieb, 1997).