Mappes Article Sexual Morality Essay

In the short article Sexual Morality and the Concept of Using anformer(a)(prenominal) Person by Thomas Mappes, there argon several points that he makes about what should be considered morally right or disparage. Mappes sticks to three briny points when it comes to what he considers morally right or price. These three cases are development another individual, deception of unrivalled by another, and obsession. All three points basically revolve around how he feels that it is wrong for angiotensin-converting enzyme person to in any fashion shape or form to use another person for sexual interaction. He bases this outdoor stage around the conventional sexual morality which outlines that sex without love is immoral.I cannot say that I completely agree or disagree with his points that are do. This is not because I cannot see what he is trying to say scarcely rather because I feel that there are many other view points to see this topic through. Firstly he talks about using anot her person in which he describes that it is wrong for one person to use another person merely as means. This is the customary basis of his entire article. Though I do agree it is wrong for one person to use another person merely as sexual means, I see many situations in which some(prenominal) parties are using separately other for the same thing. Not to have a further interaction or relationship after the matter. Mappes declares that A immorally uses B if and only if A intentionally acts in a way that violates the requirement that Bs involvement with As ends be based on Bs Voluntary informed consent.This basically means that if someone is to have sexual intercourse with another person then both people must agree to the others conditions as sanitary as respect the others wishes. However in the point I made before, there are times that both parties are using each other for the same thing. In which case does it really matter if each party is completely honest with the other? The r eason this is important is because if both parties want to have sexual intercourse with the other and have no other intentions with the other person, do they need to have a more in-depth relationship? Secondly he talks about deception of one person by another, in this he speaks about several contrary ways one could deceive another. In any which case, he views it as immoral to do so.Finally he voices his opinion about coercion, in this case coercion is basically a complex name for rape.