Comparing Machiavellis Prince and Martha Stuart :: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays

Machiavellis Prince and Martha Stuart I believe Machiavellis advice in The Prince was ideal for the rulers in 16th century Italy, because Machiavelli understood the motivation of most political men. Machiavelli establish his theories on perfect examples throughout History. Machiavelli reverently believed his advice was essential for the uniting of Italy which was his lede desire. Machiavelli states that in an ideal world, it is virtuous for a prince to be good. But in reality, princes who distance themselves from ethical concerns and do whatever it takes for the benefit of their states rule best. Therefore, it is go bad to be frugal than generous, cruel than loving, crafty than honest. Machiavellis general rule is to be as good as circumstances allow, but be automatic to resort to any means necessary for the good of the state. A prince must(prenominal) be willing to resort to evil if that is what it takes to overcome the change in fortune. Proper cruelty is done at one time and serves a specific purpose. Improper cruelty is repetitive and threatening to the citizens. A sagacious prince must be willing to practice proper cruelty in order to maintain power, but avoid improper cruelty so that his subjects do not feel hatred for him. Machiavelli emphasizes the need for the prince to win the concord of the people. A feudal prince must be wise in lordly the nobles and keeping the people content. A wise prince must not establish off confrontations for another day. Even fortresses are useless if the prince does not withdraw the support of his people. Machiavelli makes it clear hypocrisy and deceit are legitimate methods in politics. It is not important for a prince to have good qualities only step to the fore to have them. The prince must have the characteristics of both the fox and the lion. The fox stinker recognize snares but cannot drive away the enemy while the lion can protect themselves but cannot recognize snares. In d eduction, the prince must be cunning and courageous. For Machiavelli, the wellbeing of the state has no ethical or incorrupt implications. Anything that benefits the state is considered superior. Machiavelli considers the appearance of being religious as the most stringy quality.